Skip to main content
All posts

Top Short-Squeeze Candidates Today: July 27, 2026 — 7-Factor Leaderboard

LVWR tops Tapeboard's July 27, 2026, 7-factor squeeze leaderboard with a score of 100/100, as extreme 5-day momentum and threshold-list density dominate the composite scoring.

TL;DR: As of market close on July 27, 2026, LVWR leads Tapeboard's 7-factor squeeze leaderboard with a score of 100/100, driven by its 13.8% short interest and a 194.7% 5-day price momentum.

Tapeboard's daily short squeeze scan ranked 25 stocks by composite score on July 27, 2026, combining seven factors: short interest as a percentage of float, annualized borrow fee, float utilization, the FINRA Consolidated NMS short-volume ratio, days to cover, five-day price momentum, and week-over-week borrow-fee change — each z-scored against a live ~500-stock universe. The dominant pattern across the top 25 is heavy concentration of FINRA threshold names, with 19 of 25 stocks flagged on the Consolidated NMS short-volume threshold list.

Today's July 27, 2026 Squeeze Score Leaderboard

RankSymbolSqueeze ScoreSI % FloatBorrow FeeDays to CoverMom 5dT
1LVWR100.013.8%7.3+194.7%
2GRPN79.574.8%1.3%9.1-1.5%T
3ENTX74.40.7%0.1+97.0%
4LCID72.737.7%98.4%2.2-8.6%T
5CHWY61.950.2%0.4%3.1-0.9%T
6GOSS58.815.2%4.0-20.0%
7PLAY55.242.4%0.3%7.9+3.2%
8OCGN54.631.7%3.1%18.9-5.3%T
9BTDR53.945.0%0.4%6.1-0.2%T
10RH53.942.3%0.4%7.4-2.4%T
11ASAN53.738.7%0.4%6.8+2.0%T
12SVRA53.626.2%0.3%20.8-1.1%T
13RXRX53.335.2%0.5%6.7+4.2%T
14SPCE53.140.0%5.0%3.0-1.2%T
15NTLA52.734.2%0.3%9.8-2.3%T

*Source: Tapeboard composite squeeze model, July 27, 2026. Seven factors z-scored vs a ~500-stock universe. Short interest per FINRA settlement schedule; borrow fees from IBKR stock-loan availability; short-volume from FINRA Consolidated NMS. Not investment advice.*

What Drove Today's Rankings

The top 10 names are primarily driven by extreme short interest as a percentage of float, with GRPN holding 74.8% and CHWY holding 50.2%. LCID breaks this pattern as the dominant borrow-fee outlier, carrying a 98.4% annualized borrow fee alongside a 37.7% short interest to secure its rank despite a 2.2 days to cover ratio. The composite z-score heavily weights the FINRA threshold flag, which 8 of the top 10 names hold.

Top 5 Names

1. LVWR — Squeeze Score 100/100

LVWR ranks first with a 100.0 composite score, driven primarily by a +194.7% 5-day price momentum against 13.8% short interest of float. The borrow fee and 5-day fee change metrics are null, meaning the score reweighted across the remaining factors. LVWR is not currently flagged on the FINRA threshold list.

2. GRPN — Squeeze Score 79.5/100

GRPN holds a 79.5 composite score, anchored by 74.8% short interest of float and 9.1 days to cover. The stock carries a 1.3% borrow fee, down 0.1 percentage points over the last 5 trading days. GRPN sits on the FINRA threshold list, reflecting high recent short-volume concentration.

3. ENTX — Squeeze Score 74.4/100

ENTX scores 74.4, propelled by a +97.0% 5-day price momentum alongside 0.7% short interest of float and 0.1 days to cover. The borrow fee and 5-day fee change are null; therefore, the score reweighted across the remaining factors. ENTX is not flagged on the FINRA threshold list.

4. LCID — Squeeze Score 72.7/100

LCID posts a 72.7 composite score, heavily driven by a 98.4% annualized borrow fee and 37.7% short interest of float. The stock has 2.2 days to cover and a -8.6% 5-day price momentum. LCID is flagged on the FINRA threshold list, with the 5-day fee change recorded as null.

5. CHWY — Squeeze Score 61.9/100

CHWY records a 61.9 composite score, carried by 50.2% short interest of float and 3.1 days to cover. The stock carries a 0.4% borrow fee, and the 5-day fee change is null. CHWY is flagged on the FINRA threshold list, with a -0.9% 5-day price momentum.

Factor Breakdown: How the Score Is Built

The Tapeboard composite squeeze score is calculated using a static weighting model: 35% SI%Float (FINRA), 25% Borrow Fee (IBKR), 20% Float Utilization, 15% Days to Cover, and 5% 5-day momentum (Schwab). The inputs are z-scored against a live ~500-stock universe to normalize outliers. See the methodology for the exact z-score formula and data handling. Data is attributed solely to FINRA, IBKR, Schwab, SEC, and the exchanges (NYSE/NASDAQ).

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the top short-squeeze candidates today?

As of July 27, 2026, the top three short-squeeze candidates are LVWR with a 100.0 composite score and 13.8% short interest of float, GRPN with a 79.5 composite score and 74.8% short interest of float, and ENTX with a 74.4 composite score and 0.7% short interest of float. LVWR and ENTX have null borrow fee data, while GRPN has a 1.3% borrow fee.

How does Tapeboard calculate its squeeze score?

Tapeboard calculates the squeeze score by z-scoring seven factors—short interest, borrow fee, float utilization, short-volume ratio, days to cover, 5-day momentum, and 5-day fee change—against a live ~500-stock universe. The z-scores are then weighted: 35% SI%Float, 25% Borrow Fee, 20% Float Utilization, 15% Days to Cover, and 5% 5-day momentum. If a factor is null, the score reweights across the remaining factors.

When does short-interest data update?

Short interest data lags approximately 2 weeks per the FINRA settlement schedule, meaning current numbers reflect positions settled earlier in the month. Borrow fees update next-day based on IBKR stock-loan availability data. The composite squeeze score is recomputed nightly to incorporate the latest available data points.

Data and Methodology

  • Squeeze Score: Tapeboard composite, recomputed nightly.
  • Short Interest: FINRA, ~2-week settlement lag.
  • Borrow Fee: IBKR stock-loan availability, daily.
  • Short-Volume Threshold: FINRA Consolidated NMS, daily.
  • Momentum: Schwab, end-of-day.

See today's highest borrow fees for the full hard-to-borrow ranking, or the live squeeze leaderboard for tomorrow's update.

This post is for educational and informational purposes only and is not investment advice. Short selling carries unlimited downside risk. A quantitative composite does not predict price, and past squeezes are not indicative of future moves. Editor: Marcus Reilly.