Skip to main content
All posts

Top Short-Squeeze Candidates Today: July 9, 2026 — 7-Factor Leaderboard

GRPN topped Tapeboard's composite squeeze score on July 9, 2026 at 53.4/100, a leaderboard where elevated short interest as a share of float — not borrow-fee spikes — drove most of the top 10.

TL;DR: As of market close on July 9, 2026, GRPN leads Tapeboard's 7-factor squeeze leaderboard with a score of 53.4/100, driven by 70.3% short interest and a 1.6% annualized borrow fee.

Tapeboard's daily squeeze scan ranked 25 stocks by composite score on July 9, 2026, combining seven factors: short interest as a percentage of float, annualized borrow fee, float utilization, the FINRA Consolidated NMS short-volume ratio, days to cover, five-day price momentum, and week-over-week borrow-fee change — each z-scored against a live ~500-stock universe. The dominant pattern in today's top 10 is elevated short interest as a percentage of float rather than extreme borrow fees, with most names sitting between 32% and 70% SI%Float while only a handful — CRMT, RUM, SPCE, and LCID — also carry double-digit fees, suggesting broad float pressure this session rather than isolated hard-to-borrow squeezes that can precede a short squeeze.

Today's July 9, 2026 Squeeze Score Leaderboard

RankSymbolSqueeze ScoreSI % FloatBorrow FeeDays to CoverMom 5dT
1GRPN53.470.3%1.6%8.3+3.6%T
2ELF42.149.9%0.4%2.6-3.8%T
3CRMT40.741.7%10.4%1.0+24.7%T
4CHWY38.346.5%0.3%2.4+0.3%T
5BEAM36.232.2%0.3%14.2+7.0%T
6RH34.638.6%0.4%4.9+2.6%T
7RUM33.634.9%8.2%6.7+1.6%T
8SPCE33.635.9%9.5%1.0-5.8%T
9RXRX33.535.9%0.5%8.4+2.5%T
10LCID33.138.2%28.4%4.3-12.1%T
11EVGO32.634.8%1.0%9.9-5.3%T
12RCKT32.625.2%0.3%8.4+19.0%T
13PLAY32.640.0%0.3%5.6-8.4%T
14CSIQ32.431.6%1.8%5.4-4.2%T
15TRIP32.129.9%0.4%6.8-3.1%T

*Source: Tapeboard composite squeeze model, July 9, 2026. Seven factors z-scored vs a ~500-stock universe. Short interest per FINRA settlement schedule; borrow fees from IBKR stock-loan availability; short-volume from FINRA Consolidated NMS. Not investment advice.*

What Drove Today's Rankings

Short interest as a percentage of float is the common thread across today's top 10, with eight of the ten names posting SI%Float above 32% while carrying borrow fees under 1%. CRMT is the clearest outlier, ranking third on the back of a 10.4% borrow fee and a 24.7% five-day move even though its 41.7% SI%Float sits below GRPN and ELF. Because SI%Float carries the heaviest single weight in the composite, high-float-pressure names without expensive borrows were still able to outrank higher-fee tickers lower in the table.

Top 5 Names

1. GRPN — Squeeze Score 53.4/100

GRPN's score is driven primarily by an SI%Float of 70.3%, the highest reading in today's data set by a wide margin. Its borrow fee sits at just 1.6%, and the stock remains on the FINRA threshold list with a days-to-cover reading of 8.3, indicating the float pressure has not yet translated into an expensive borrow.

2. ELF — Squeeze Score 42.1/100

ELF's 49.9% SI%Float is the second-highest in the leaderboard and the primary driver of its rank. The borrow fee is low at 0.4%, and five-day momentum was negative at -3.8%, with the name also flagged on the FINRA threshold list this week.

3. CRMT — Squeeze Score 40.7/100

CRMT's 10.4% borrow fee is the primary contributor, the second-highest fee among today's top 15. Five-day momentum of +24.7% is the strongest in the data set, while days-to-cover of just 1.0 shows shorts could exit quickly at recent volume; the stock is also FINRA-threshold flagged.

4. CHWY — Squeeze Score 38.3/100

CHWY's rank is driven by a 46.5% SI%Float, the third-highest in the data set, despite a borrow fee of only 0.3%. Momentum was roughly flat at +0.3% over five days, and the name carries a FINRA threshold flag with a days-to-cover of 2.4.

5. BEAM — Squeeze Score 36.2/100

BEAM carries the lowest borrow fee in today's top 10 at 0.3%, so its score is carried instead by the longest days-to-cover reading in the top 15 at 14.2 alongside a 32.2% SI%Float. Five-day momentum was positive at +7.0%, and the stock is flagged on the FINRA threshold list.

Factor Breakdown: How the Score Is Built

Tapeboard's squeeze score weights seven inputs into a single composite via the methodology: 35% short interest as a percentage of float (FINRA), 25% borrow fee (IBKR), 20% float utilization, 15% days to cover, and 5% five-day momentum (Schwab), with the FINRA Consolidated NMS short-volume ratio and week-over-week fee change folded into the underlying z-scores. Each factor is standardized against a live ~500-stock universe before weighting, so a stock's rank reflects how extreme it is relative to peers, not raw magnitude alone.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the top short-squeeze candidates today?

As of July 9, 2026, the top three are GRPN (score 53.4, 70.3% SI%Float, 1.6% borrow fee), ELF (score 42.1, 49.9% SI%Float, 0.4% borrow fee), and CRMT (score 40.7, 41.7% SI%Float, 10.4% borrow fee).

How does Tapeboard calculate its squeeze score?

Each of seven factors — SI%Float, borrow fee, float utilization, FINRA short-volume ratio, days to cover, five-day momentum, and week-over-week fee change — is z-scored against a live ~500-stock universe, then combined using fixed weights (35% SI%Float, 25% borrow fee, 20% float utilization, 15% days to cover, 5% momentum) into a single 0-100 composite.

When does short-interest data update?

Short interest lags roughly two weeks behind the trade date under the FINRA settlement schedule, while borrow fees update on a next-day basis from IBKR stock-loan availability.

Data and Methodology

  • Squeeze score: Tapeboard composite, recomputed nightly.
  • Short interest: FINRA, roughly a two-week settlement lag.
  • Borrow fee: IBKR stock-loan availability, updated daily.
  • Short-volume threshold: FINRA Consolidated NMS, updated daily.
  • Momentum: Schwab, end-of-day pricing.

See today's highest borrow fees for the full hard-to-borrow ranking, or the live squeeze leaderboard for tomorrow's update.

This post is for educational and informational purposes only and is not investment advice. Short selling carries unlimited downside risk. A quantitative composite does not predict price, and past squeezes are not indicative of future moves. Editor: Marcus Reilly.

Institutional-grade tools, browser-based.

Get every ticker in this post on a real terminal, scanner, charts, filings, insider trades, and 800K+ economic series in one tab. Free tier, no credit card.

Try Tapeboard free → 7-day Pro trial · no card